Genetically modified organism Essay

A genetically circumscribed organism (GMO) is an organism which been using genetic engineering techniques, and Monsanto is a publicly agricultural biotechnology comp some(prenominal). Monsanto has a huge influence on GMO products. Unfortunately, Monsanto is non a great company because they produce harmful products and harp to their customers. Absolutely, Monsanto didnt do the illegal things, b atomic number 18ly they didnt obey the morality. As seen in the video, I would wish to discuss Contemporary Consequentialism which depend on legal expert, Kantian Ethics which as a form of deontological ethics and Social hack Theory which depend on law to discuss Monsantos case.GMO products sounds like good for our health and economy, entirely some companies like Monsanto dont do well. Contemporary Consequentialism Contemporary consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories which justice takes an important role. As its name suggests, Consequentialism is the take depend on ly on consequences. justice contains distributive justice and retributive justice (Driver P61). Justice lodge in the distribution of benefits is called distributive justice, such as taxation and health care.Justice concern the distribution of rewards and punishments is called retributive justice, such as good citizens awards and prison terms. The theory determining whether or not an action is well(p) are the consequences produced by that action (Driver, 2007, p. 40) did not lead to positive consequences for the Monsanto company. The nourishment and Drug Administration (FDA) also lied near their founding in 1992. Since 1992, 37 people died and thousands more were seriously ill after ingest ace of the GMO foods made by Monsanto.This is not only ethic issue, but also is illegal. Monsantos character was selfish and didnt make the cosmos a better place (Hinman, 2002). Monsanto should be punished by justice. These GMO foods are killing people by the tens of thousands and The FDA do esnt have any responds. I think FDA is the plentifulgest travesty in the U. S. Theyre turning a concealment eye to their patients misery. Kantian Ethics Kantian ethics is a deontological ethical theory which proposed by Immanuel Kant.He verbalize A good will is good not because of what it affects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to learn some proposed end its good only though its willing (Driver, P80). According to the video we manage the world according to Monsanto. Its a very dangerous phenomenon. They essential the public to believe they hold supererogatory acts. We are present several scenarios where Monsantos influence on FDA and other regulatory agencies has servinged them to continue their un-ethical business practices.Hinman said what is fair for one should be fair for all. Monsanto doesnt care other things just want to get maximum profit with all the possible methods. This is all about money. More money is selling GMO foods to other countries that are wi lling to requital large amounts of money. Maybe local and organic foods are healthy but there is no market for them. Monsanto make a decision which is mated to Kantian ethics. Monsanto carrys to know we should to keep promises even when we dont want to do.As we seen in the videos, we know no matter the start point is moral or Kantian ethics, Monsanto and its subsidiaries made some maltreat decisions. Social Contract Theory Social contract theory is the view that persons moral. Social contract theory is rightly associated with new-fangled moral and it is also a theory or model. Thomas Hobbs said where there is no common power there is no law, where no law, no Injustice (Driver, P102). He believed that human beings were motivated by self-interest.This put down which Monsanto have claims that it has evolved from long-standing commitments to safety, environmental protection, customer service, first-class research, and product stewardship (Robin, 2008). Monsantos enrolment is to tal lie. Farmers also need to sign an agreement when they want to evoke the GMO food from Monsanto. Monsanto does believe that they are ethically right in suing a small farmer in order to preserve the balance of the agriculture community as a whole. Monsanto is using everyone to monopolize food and in the end with the ultimate power over everyone.I think I dont any great idea to solve this big problem. According to the video, I think just hope Monsanto doesnt specify to grow marijuana. They cant mass produce organic foods any better than they can keep Wall Street on track. We know the products which Monsanto produced should not exist. These products cant help us to make a better world. According to this theory we know first we essential be guarantees that people will not harm each other, and people must be able to rely on the other to keep their agreements. Absolutely, Monsanto doesnt obey the theory.ConclusionThrough the discussion about Contemporary Consequentialism, Kantian E thics and Social Contract Theory, We know Monsanto didnt make a good decision between money and moral, and the FDA also help Monsanto to lie to their people. These harmful products and illegal documents must be stopped by government. sometimes we can bring out the problems, but they are difficult to solve. GMO products are an tremendous invention, and I think it can change our life. People are wrong, Monsanto is wrong. Monsanto cannot find an equilibrium point between ethics and business, or we can utter money and moral.Many people and company were destroyed by the profit. We need to find a great equilibrium point and it will help us to work better and will not lose ourselves. fictional character Hinman, L Ph. D. (2002) Basic moral orientations overview. Power Point, Univerity of San Diego, San Diego, CA Driver, J. (2007). God and human beings Nature. Ethics The Fundamentals (pp. 22-39). Malden, MA Blackwell. Weston, A. (2007). Creative problem-solving in ethics. New York, NY O xford University Press. http//www. iep. utm. edu/soc-cont/.