Examples of Evaluation Method

Preference military tramp Example A. Direct-Objective military rank Direct-objective evaluation merchantman be in the form of riddle result which attached the object with the objective of the test now through the test result Examples 1. appreciate the student learning objectives by stack away information on student instruction execution on tests.If the objective is to feature students able to master a particular scientific discipline, and that skill is tested in a a few(prenominal) questions on an over either exam, the instructor can evaluate attainment of the skill by looking at just those applicable questions on the exam which willing harbor direct measure amongst the test result and particular skill they have. 2. try aircraft locomotive engine performance after scab visit. The objective is to get optimum air flow through the engine. The object is the dynamic headroom among the blades and the shrouds. Method * measure the length of all blades * measure th e diameter of the shrouds * measure clearance between blades and shrouds check on the manual of arms book about the clearance limitations * make adjustment to get optimum clearance refer to manual This method will directly effect on the engine performance by resulting an optimum air flow through the engine which will watch the engine bypass ratio on its optimum level. B. ordinal number Evaluation Ordinal evaluation allows us to sort the rank of the object that we measure. The limits of the values are non clear, so that can be compared tho if the value is higher, the same or turn down than the others precisely we cant enjoin how much different interval between the values. Examples 1. The T-shirt size S low-spirited M MediumL Large 2. The scale of oftenness 1- Always 2- Often 3- Rarely 4- periodic 5- Never C. Pair Wise compare Pair wise coincidence in the main refers to any process of comparing entities in pairs to judge which of each entity is preferred, or has a greater amount of some quantitative property. The method of pair wise comparing is used in the scientific debate of preferences, attitudes, voting systems, social choice, public choice, and multi element AI systems. (Wikipedia) Example Choosing to buy a motorcycle with criteria as follows * bell * scotch * convention Weight for each criteria * Price three time more grave than design Price is two times more distinguished than economical * economical one-half times more consequential than design Pair wise comparison matrix Criteria Price Economical Design Priority Vector Price 1 2 3 0. 5455 Economical 0. 5 1 1. 5 0,2727 Design 0. 333 0. 667 1 0,1818 totality 1. 833 3,667 5. 5 1 found on weight of each criteria, charge is the most important, economical is the second important and design is the least important. D. Nominal Evaluation Nominal evaluation classified the criteria but with no relative meaning. Each criteria not represented which one is better or bigger, only categorized it ased on assignment and fact of the object. Examples 1. Number of DKI Jakarta citizen base on religion (2005) Religion Islam, Christian, Catholic, Hindu, Buddha res publica Islam Christian Catholic Hindu Buddha Total DKI Jakarta 7,157,182 501,168 336,514 28,508 313,217 8,336,589 2. Evaluate the number of pile based on marriage billet 1 Married 2 mavin 3. Blood type classification A, B , O or AB 4. ethnical group classification Javanese, Sundanese, or Betawi 5. salmagundi of part based on strain red, blue, yellow, green, etc