.

Monday, February 25, 2019

Female Bounding Colour Purple Essay

Do you agree with the count on that the British natural processs at Amritsar were warrant in the import of initiation war one The British actions at Amritsar were justified in the subsequentlymath of world war one to an extent. The war seemed to encouragement the self esteem on Indians and meld them, signaling threat against the raj, however the view in origination 10 shows that there was no validation of a conspiracy, source 11 agrees with this but in like manner shows why dyer business leader provoke acted in this way. Source 12 agrees with the fact that the actions were justified in the aftermath of world war one. The aftermath of world war one increase the self esteem if Indian as they were fighting alongside British soldiers, it also strengthened the arguments of the Indian politicians that India should be given a great say in Indian affairs, this suggests that Indian nationalism was starting to progress.Muslims and Hindus had also joined together, forming the Luc know pact, which shows that the Indians were becoming more powerful as they were joining together but the day of the massacre in Amritsar only included broadly Sikh the great unwashed who were gathered to celebrate their religious festival exhibit that the attacks werent necessary. local officials also went on strike as a result of the aftermath of the war, suggesting that deport for the raj was crumbling, showing that maybe the action of the British at Amritsar were ascribable to the fear of Indian nationalism and the falling stick out for the raj. still source 10 clearly says that it is not proven that both conspiracy had been formed and that Dyer had acted beyond the necessity of the case showing that his action was not necessary and fair as there was no cogent evidence and evidence at the scene at jailaiwad bagh to justify that the actions of the British.Source 11 is a letter by Dyer saying that if he had hesitated it would have commence attack showing that the British m ight of felt that the Indians had gained power after world war one so they might attack . The source also suggests that there was no proof that there was going to be an attack, but dyer assumed it and consequently has fired without warning, this supports source 10 which says that it wasnt proven that there was a conspiracy, showing that dyers actions were not necessary. However after world war one hartal were being organised to defy against the Rowlett acts, the two men who had started these hartals were arrested by the authorities, this lead to riots in Amritsar. The riots soon off into an anti European attack, European women and children were beaten.Therefore source 11 could suggest that the reason Dyer fired without warning at the dense crowd was due to his fear of an attack as there were meetings being held in jalilawad bagh discussing the Rowlett acts, therefore dyer had presumed that a similar result to the Amritsar riots was bound to happen. The result of the riots at Amrit sar support source 12, which is a letter by the European women thanking dyer for his actions which saved the Punjab and thereby preserved the honour and lives of hundreds of women and children this show that the women has felt threatened by what had happened at the riots which they also presumed would of happened at jailiawa bagh.However there was no proof on the day of the massacre that there was a conspiracy or every form of rebellion. To conclude, the British actions at Amritsar were justified in the aftermath of world war one to an extent , the Indian confidence had risen and they started to unite which shows that they were heading towards nationalism which was a threat to the raj, the Amritsar riots had also made an work of the actions of dyer on the day of the massacre as many European women and children were killed , this might of showed that the same was bound to happen in jalianwala bagh as many people were gathered together and some were also discussing and protesting aga inst the Rowlett acts. However as it says in source 10, it is not proven that any conspiracy had been formed to let down British power suggesting that dyers actions were necessary as there was no proof on the day.

No comments:

Post a Comment