Banning Performance enhancing Drugs from Sports

At the onset, drugs argon chemical substances that drop concern the sensible body. They ar primarily made to treat illness and disease. However, on that point argon both(prenominal) drugs that ar hired for other pur adhere beyond treating physical illness. These drugs be comm besides known as the tender drugs and ar usually taken to suspensor people to or to give handlingrs an gratifying experience (Beashel, P. Sibson, A. & Taylor, J. p. 140).While there argon social drugs that are illegal, Beashe, Sibson, and Taylor (2001) aptly express that many of these drugs are procurable within social institution and can be taken in the context of relaxing experience and enhancing sports surgical operation (p. 140). There is nonhing wrong with these so long as these drugs are publicly available which means their examples by the public are allowed by truth. In other words, they are in particular non deadly to the physical body. Most of the performance enhancing drugs belon gs to the so-called social drugs. They are drugs that are available within social institution and are therefore not particularly harmful to the physical body, hence they should not ban from sports merely in the context of dirty competition since anyone can avail of those drugs within social institution. Currently, all performance enhancing drugs are taboo in sports regardless of its authoritative physical midpoint and soul. According to Beashel, Sibson, and Taylor, there are close to performance enhancing drugs that are harmful but many are not.Doping drugs like Nandrolone, testosterone, stanozolol, clenbuterol catch the effect of reducing recovery judgment of conviction to be able to train harder and longer. These drugs excessively increases muscle bulk, strength and endurance when combined regular exercise (p. 141). These drugs are not harmful when taken correctly or responsibly, their impacts are ostensibly deepen through regular exercise. Analgesics (narcotic) like Co deine, Methadone, and heroin are inconvenience oneself killers which their effect allows training and competing even when injured (p.141). Other performance enhancing drugs such(prenominal) as Human growth hormone (HGH), erythropoietin are thought to mend performance, and increase number of red blood cells, which means that more type O can be carried to the muscles and endurance is remedyd. On the other hand, there are some drugs that need to be ban from sports. These drugs are those that are harmful to the physical health. Among these drugs are the Beta blockers. This drug according to Beashel, Sibson, and Taylor keep meaning rate and blood pressure low (p. 141).While there are some benefit for low heart rate but this is yet during the resting time not during the time of extreme activities. This is same with low blood pressure. impression blood pressure means that the does not pump enough which is authoritative when doing extreme activities such as sports competition. Low he art rates may lead to dizziness and weakness in the flow of blood to the brain. intoxicant and baccy plant drugs are no doubt harmful and should be banned as they too contribute to the reducing blood pressure and the heart rate. Banning only harmful drugsSince performance enhancing drugs can be slowly identified as harmful and not harmful, the government should ban only those that are harmful but allow with minimal restriction the persona of non harmful drugs in sports. Responsible use of these drugs will not pose health problems rather it will enhance the potential of the athlete. Therefore what is un keep downable is for the government activity to come up with better guidelines on the victorian and answerable use of these drugs. Banning only harmful drugs will help athletes avoid using the wrong drugs that causes the health problems.Thus, by categorizing harmful and non harmful, health authorities can easily grant necessary guidelines and information that will help the athlete avoid those harmful drugs, and they may be able to delineate what type of drugs that they need. Banning all the performance enhancing drugs in sports is counter procreative as it only leads to criminal offense due to substance call out in the sense that it was use against the existing ban and not against the law concerning public health protection.Allowing athletes to use performance drugs should they decide to do so Given the many hazardous and more dangerous substances that that are a good deal available to every body such as alcohol and tobacco which are among the top causes of deaths in America and in many move of the world, it would be un exclusively to ban athletes from using performance enhancing drugs simply because of isolated case of death relating to the use of such drugs.As it has been argued above, the lack of proper guidelines as to which drugs are harmful and which are not makes it more dangerous for those who genuinely inadequacyed to explore their p otential rather than the drugs it self. Athletes who may wish to use such drugs should be given freedom to do so just as anyone who may wish to drink alcohol or they want to smoke they can simply buy tobacco practically anywhere. This is an ingrained rights and the essence of the freedom of choice exercise freely by tobacco smokers or the alcoholics.The arguments concerning natural and unnatural enhancement which emphasized that drug enhanced performance is illegitimate is not sound argument every athletes are taking all sorts of drug supplement such as vitamins, pills and so forth, just to keep themselves fit. The Database Book (2004) points out, There is nothing natural nearly taking vitamin pills or wearing whole-body Lycra suits. The book noted that diet, medicine, technology, and even coach already give an artificial advantage to those athletes who can afford the better(p) of all these aids (p.88). By allowing athletes to use of performance drugs, it will provide equal mee ting field for everyone and athletes can compete openly and fairly. Allowing athletes to use performance enhancing drugs if the so wished enhanced the quality of sports and the entertainment it provides to the viewing public. Vincent Parrillo (2008) pointed that the nearly obvious reason why athletes wants to use performance enhancing drugs are to construct a better athlete and have enhanced sports related outcomes (p. 263).Parrillo supercharge add that athletes use such substance to recover from and prevent injuries, to improve their appearance, and in some cases in response to pressure from coaches (p. 263). These reasons are not at all subjective and they are valid. Regardless of what others say, athletes are beingness pressured to do more than they can do with their natural capacity by their coaches to win their granulars. The argument that allowing athletes to use performance enhancement drugs is like sacrificing the health of the athletes for the sake of better entertainm ent does not really hold much.With proper information and guidelines on the use of such chemical substances, there is no way that the athletes health could be sacrificed. It could not be denied that the public enjoys watching high level competition. The public are the measure payers where the money for sports development is coming from and they deserve high level sports. The incidents of deaths among athletes who utilise performance enhancement drugs can still be considered isolated compared to the deaths caused by alcohol and tobacco.If there is any thing that should be banned in sports it is certainly not those harmful drugs, but first and foremost are tobacco and alcohol and those drugs that are proven harmful to the health not only of the athletes but of everybody. The use of performance enhancing drugs among athletes continued to scandalize assorted sports competition spawning splinter group of competitors and sports administrators to promote the concept of officially legali zing the use of some of the substances that enhanced performance.Legalizing drugs will not only eliminate the problems of unfair competition but also the shame and embarrassment of athletes who may have use the substance not for winning a particular game but for fast recovery from injury to be able to play the next game. Allowing the use of performance enhancing drugs for athletes is very practical and a declaration to the conflicting view of what is drugs and what is not. Nigel South (1998) noted that even tea and java have both been illegal drugs and vilified, as is alcohol today in Saudi Arabia and a number of other Muslim countries (p.104) while hempen necktie and other stimulant drugs have been and continue to be not only legal in some parts of the world but also an important aspect of their culture in which they are used (South, p. 104). death While most of the authors and important personalities in sports are against the use of drugs in sports, they cannot deny that no ma tter were the efforts to make sports drug free, it remains the reservoir of scandal and embarrassment not only for the athletes, but also for the community they represents.Just like the problems of illegal drugs on the street that have never been beat out despite on the war on drugs, the use of performance enhancing drugs will persist so long as the athletes are being pressured to do beyond their capacity in order to win the game. Because of the nature of some drugs and its medical prescription on patient, there will always be an effort to exploit the situation to gain an advantage in sports.Only when athletes are allowed to use such substances should they decide to use them can the fair contend field will be realized. Thus, Athletes should be allowed to use such substances in the name of fairness and high level competitive sports. Reference Beashe, P. Sibson, A. & Taylor, J. (2001) The human race of Sport Examined China Nelson Thornes The Debatabase Book (2004) USA IDEA Parril lo, V. (2008) Encyclopedia of genial Problems USA Sage Publication South, N. (1998) Drugs USA Sage Publication.