Relationship Between Lennie And George Essay

Relationship Between Lennie And George EssayAnalysing the relationship mingled with George and Lennie in Steinbecks Of Mice and MenIn the opening section of the novella, Steinbeck wishes to portray the relationship amidst George and Lennie as leader and follower. Steinbeck set offs that they walked in single file d profess the constringe path and when they came into the open, one stayed behind the other which immediately indicates that George is dominant in this relationship, therefore Lennie is somewhat ir trus bothrthy, dep demiseent and incapable of looking subsequently himself. This flesh illustrates that George acts as a p arntal figure and Lennie is similar to a diffident child hiding behind a father. Furthermore, in Chapter 2 this mind is developed when George in like manner carries Lennies work card, knowing that Lennie would lose it if he was responsible for it Think Id let you carry your own work card?. This repeat shows how George acts as a parental figure for Len nie George must look after Lennies important possessions, as George knows that he will that lose them beca physical exertion of his simple-mindedness. The rhetorical question also shows Georges frustration with Lennies sm wholly mental capacity as he is always creating problems.Also, when we are first introduced to Lennie and George, the main physical differences between them are highlighted. Lennie is huge, shapeless of face and often dehumanized to be that of a bear. However, George on the other hand, is small, quick and thin with, restless eyes and fragile arms. This description is a form of juxtaposition, as the two citations contrast in appearance. It would form an consider in the indorsers minds of two characters that differ greatly, and could supposedly be the opposite of one another. I think the authors intentions of using of this language technique, would be to make a point of their differences and suggest that their personalities also greatly fight down each other. So this makes us read on to find issue why we find these two opposing characters together in the story. passim the passage, Lennie is referred to as a bear, and a huge companion with dragging feet. This creates an image in the reviewers mind of a man who is giant-like in size and is supposedly clumsy and uncoordinated. The authors drop of the animal(prenominal) Bear to compare Lennie to, symbolizes that he rump be the dangerous, strong bear, or the cuddly teddy bear. It indicates that whilst Lennie is a larger-than-life and strong man, he is also just a playful, childish male child who needs guidance.Steinbeck also metaphorically compares Lennie snorting into water like a horse Lennies actions are similar to an animal, unlike humans who cup their hold to drink water. This emphasizes that he will act upon an animal instinct and his animal characteristics extend Lennies great effectuality that he is unaware of this holds immense splendor in the novel as it foreshadows the d ownfall of Lennie due to his powerful strength and animal instincts.Verbs and adverbs are chosen specifically to reflect Lennies and Georges attitudes and characteristics. Generally actions and descriptive words attached to Lennie show a lack of confidence and maturity, for lesson words such as dabbled and timidly displays Lennies hesitancy and unassertiveness, whilst George on the other hand has words adverbs such as sharply and thinly which suggests that he is thinks a lot before all his actions. overall the reader can deduce with erupt whatsoever explanation required, that Lennie most likely needs supervision from George, and looks up to him as a role model because he admires his intelligence and general behaviour/demeanour.In the books dialogue, Steinbeck uses slang,colloquialism, and non- regulation terms (aint, would of, brang, and so on) to convey an authentic sense of the characters. This casual dialect(shes a loo loo, Curleys got ants in his pants) helps flirt a partic ular time, place, and social background that make the book levelheaded real as headspring as the characters more relatable. Whats more, is that the lack of standard English is constant throughout all speech, characters dont speak with more finale to other specific characters. Even Lennie, though hes slow, isnt less able to air with words than others.This aspect sufficientizes the characters and gives them a lack of identity or purpose. Overall it addresses the theme of power and each characters lack of control over their own destiny. Readers may run into these aspects negatively, because it is symbolic of the lack of importance or substance people had back in the contexts day. However, on the other hand you could interpret it as a good thing that all of society was equal, everyone had equal chances and people felt a good sense of community and belonging.Towards the end of chapter 6, as Lennies captors advance towards him, Steinbeck gives a brief description, using pathetic fa llacy, of the landscape in which the story is unfolding Already the sun had left the valley to go climbing up the slopes of the Gablian Mountains, and the hill tops were rosy in the sun. I believe Steinbecks desired intentions of using this specific technique, is to reflect that all look forward to of the American conceive of has been lost, due to the death of Curleys wife. The sun is the light, which represents hope and happiness, and the fact it has left the valley represents the reality of the situation that Lennie has ruined any chance they once had of fulfilling the dream. The use of the word already in particular, depicts the root word that all hope vanished as soon as Lennie killed her there was no way he could have made amends. This would make the reader tone sympathy/pity for Lennie, as they have grown attached to his character throughout the book, and they know the death was unintentional.Also, embedded frequently throughout the book, is the use of structural motifs. In particular, the recurring element of the American Dream, and its dismal achievability, is utilise to signify the relationship between Lennie and George. It exemplifies one of the reasons why we find the two characters together their differences are made apparent yet they both shell out and hold onto this strong sense of longing for this scenario, no matter how out of reach it is.Additionally, each time George repeats this dream to Lennie, his intonation and demeanor in which he says it, reflects its true state of achievability. For example, in chapter one, where Lennie and George have no commercial enterprise and no comfortable sanctuary, George is reluctant to finish describing the dream, I aint got time for no more, this hesitancy shows that he has obvious doubt in fulfilling it due to the current circumstances he and Lennie is in.However, in chapter 3, when Candy offers his savings into the purchasing of the house, George becomes stirred up as he believes the dream is now within reach. Steinbeck shows this through the use of short sentences and informal dialect, Jesus Christ I bet we could quaver her, because we relate excitement with uncontrollable language, colloquialism and the inability to produce school sentences, therefore it creates authenticity and pace for the reader, thus making it more believable.Lastly, in chapter 6, the dream is again repeated, back where the story first began. Yet now, the dream is fragmented, separated with the use of ellipses, Youan me. This punctuational technique symbolizes the loss and feebleness of the dream, as well as Georges despair of having to kill Lennie to save him from the oncoming lynch mob. Now, its no longer a chore for George he wants to take it slow and let Lennie enjoy it fully before he dies, it truly reflects that George needs Lennie just as much as he needs him. Overall the reader would sympathize for both of them, because we can understand that George only did this for Lennies benefit, and de spite their disputes they cared slightly each other very much.The plot in Of Mice And Men is also an example of a circular narrative it concludes in the same location, and George and Lennie are once again fleeing from trouble. This structure is used to offer a of import moral about difficult the American Dream is to fulfill, as well as to reveal the sad absurdity of dreams in general. Overall this highlights Steinbecks hopeless views towards the dream as he adapts his story to portray the dream to be impossible for all, Curleys wife included. However, on the other hand, Lennies death was inevitable because of the escalating close he was evoking, so others could interpret it as a blessing that Lennie died at the hands of a man he trusts, painlessly and still accept in his dream. So readers may believe Steinbeck wrote this to emphasize the beauty of friendships and highlight how important it is for mankind to uphold them.